Most large organizations already know what they should do. They see the opportunities, understand where efficiencies could be gained, and recognize unmet customer needs. The problem isn’t awareness. It’s execution.

Over the last decade, many organizations tried to close this gap with dedicated innovation labs, agile sprints, and transformation units. These efforts often began with energy but produced few lasting results. Ideas were generated, pilots were launched, and momentum faded. The core business moved on. There were exceptions to this, but they remained the minority (more to come on this in coming weeks).

In most cases, the problem wasn’t creativity or strategy. It was structure. Innovation efforts operated outside the systems that drive decision-making, resource allocation, and commercialization. The work was well-intended but systemically fragile.

Recent advances in AI introduce a new possibility. Not because they replace human ingenuity, but because they offer a way to embed structure where it has historically been missing. When applied thoughtfully, AI can reduce friction, surface opportunities, deploy resources, and guide action — not just for innovation teams, but across the enterprise.

The organizations best positioned for this future won’t be the most imaginative. They’ll be the most disciplined to put the proper systems in place.

This article introduces the Innovation Intelligence Curve — a framework for understanding how innovation systems will evolve, and why the path toward autonomous innovation begins with ensuring the basics work today.
‍

From Conversational AI to Innovation Infrastructure

When generative AI first entered the enterprise, its impact was largely tactical. Employees used it to write faster, ideate more broadly, and simplify complex tasks. These early use cases were promising, but fragmented — limited to individuals, rarely integrated into formal systems.

That phase — what we call conversational innovation — created small gains but reinforced inconsistency. A few power users flourished, while most remained on the sidelines.

Then, a shift occurred. Organizations began embedding AI not just into tasks, but into the innovation process itself. They moved beyond standalone tools and started building structured, repeatable workflows around AI — workflows that helped even non-experts frame problems, validate assumptions, and generate investment-ready concepts in minutes rather than weeks. In some cases, we have seen AI agents that could scan a company’s full portfolio of innovation efforts — both efficiency plays and new product or service ideas — and offer structured feedback: highlighting gaps, flagging duplication, or suggesting higher-leverage paths forward.

Which brings us to what we call — facilitated innovation. It transforms AI from an assistant into an operating layer. Innovation work becomes faster, yes — but more importantly, it becomes standardized, teachable, scalable, and investable.

In early pilots across multiple industries, teams using these structured approaches completed idea validation 70% faster than traditional innovation teams. While results are early, the signs are promising. We’re already seeing a meaningful increase in commercialization rates compared to traditional approaches. Employees with no prior background in product development or market research produced outputs that once required full sprint teams or external consultants.

As one innovation leader reflected: “We used to need a full sprint team for this. Now one person can get 80% of the way there in an afternoon.”

This is more than a productivity gain. It’s a shift in capability architecture. For decades, CEOs have wished their organizations could “be more innovative” across the entire business. For the first time, that aspiration is becoming structurally possible. With the right systems, a 20,000-person organization can now embed innovation literacy across roles and regions — not just in one team, but enterprise-wide. And AI is proving capable not just of enabling the work, but of reinforcing the culture required to sustain it (more to come on this in coming weeks).

‍

The Innovation Intelligence Curve

These phases aren’t isolated. They form a progression — a path we call the Innovation Intelligence Curve.

At the bottom of the curve, AI is helpful but underutilized. At the top, it becomes a dynamic system: surfacing insights, evaluating options, and eventually recommending — or initiating — action.

Two dimensions determine where a company sits on the curve:
‍

1. Organizational Maturity — the readiness of a company’s systems, governance, and culture to support scalable innovation. This includes decision rights, data quality, leadership alignment, and integration with the core business.
   ‍
2. Innovation Intelligence — the extent to which AI is shaping and improving the innovation process itself. This is not just about faster output; it’s about better judgment, guided exploration, and higher-fidelity decision-making at every stage.
   ‍

As organizations climb both axes, they move from ad hoc exploration to systematized experimentation — and ultimately toward intelligent, self-improving innovation infrastructure.
‍

• High Intelligence without Maturity creates chaos.
• High Maturity without Intelligence breeds stagnation.
• Only by building both can firms unlock the next phase.
  ‍

Autonomous Innovation: When the System Begins to Lead

At the top of the curve lies what we describe as autonomous innovation — a phase where the system supporting innovation no longer waits for instruction. It begins to operate with agency: identifying inefficiencies, surfacing growth opportunities, and recommending action before formal planning cycles ever begin.

This is not a change in how ideas are generated. It’s a change in how decisions are made — and executed. Rather than waiting for teams to uncover patterns, the system observes, interprets, and acts in real time.

Early examples are already emerging. Some systems flag underleveraged resources. Others propose shifts in business architecture based on market signals. Over time, these systems will begin to coordinate investment, product development, and go-to-market execution — with less human prompting and more internal logic.

Importantly, this does not eliminate innovation teams. It reframes them. Leaders shift from being initiators to orchestrators — setting direction, managing tradeoffs, and defining boundaries. The system begins to carry more of the operational weight.

And this next phase is closer than most realize. Once AI understands your business, workflows, and focus areas — it can begin advising with increasing precision. We’re already seeing structured, high-quality recommendations from AI systems deployed in client environments. The leap from facilitated to autonomous isn’t far. It’s a matter of intent — and infrastructure.

The organizations best positioned for this future aren’t the ones with the most ideas. They’re the ones with the most discipline: clear data, aligned incentives, strong governance, and systems that learn. Autonomous innovation is not a future state. It’s a function of readiness.

What Leaders Should Do Now

The most disciplined organizations are not waiting for autonomous innovation to arrive. They are preparing for it — by building the conditions under which it can succeed.

That preparation begins with a clear understanding of how innovation operates today. Not just where ideas come from, but how they are resourced, evaluated, and integrated into the business. In many companies, this process remains informal or inconsistent. And in those cases, the absence of structure — not the absence of creativity — is the limiting factor.

Leading firms are addressing this by formalizing the systems that support innovation. They are clarifying how decisions are made, how data is interpreted, and how knowledge moves across functions. They are organizing information so intelligent systems can learn from it. They are installing mechanisms — feedback loops, evaluation criteria, governance processes — that make innovation repeatable, not exceptional.

Above all, they are shifting their view of innovation: not as a siloed function, but as an enterprise capability. One that is embedded, scalable, and eventually participatory — where intelligent systems support the work, and in time, begin to lead it.

The biggest leap forward will not come from the next version of AI. It will come from organizations that are structurally ready to absorb and apply it — with discipline, clarity, and purpose.

‍